MATHEMATICAL DESIGN MODEL BASED ON SMART AIRPORT CONNECTIVITY WITH AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH IN THE TOD AREA OF SOEKARNO-HATTA AIRPORT

Raihan Fachri  Bachmid; Martinus Bambang  Susetyarto; Sri  Tundono

doi:10.53067/ijomral.v5i5.502

Authors

Raihan Fachri Bachmid Universitas Trisakti
Martinus Bambang Susetyarto Universitas Trisakti
Sri Tundono Universitas Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53067/ijomral.v5i5.502

Keywords:

Smart Airport Connectivity, Transit-Oriented Development, Airport Terminal, Mathematical Model, Phygital Design

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the priority design criteria for Terminal 4 of Soekarno-Hatta Airport based on Smart Airport Connectivity within the context of a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) area, and to formulate a conceptual mathematical model for assessing the sensitivity of terminal design performance. The main research problem originates from the inefficiency of the existing terminal circulation, which tends to be linear, the weak integration of intermodal transport, and the potential conflict between passenger and baggage movement flows. This study applies a descriptive quantitative approach through a digital questionnaire distributed to 120 respondents, resulting in 100 valid responses for analysis. The analysis includes validity testing, reliability testing, descriptive statistics, and the synthesis of a third-order polynomial mathematical model, expressed as y = ax³ + bx² + cx + (d+e). The results show that comfort obtained the highest score at 2.27, followed by smart airport digital at 2.23, good connectivity at 1.99, safety at 1.97, and passenger-baggage integration at 1.59. In the simulation scenario, safety and comfort constants were assigned the maximum operational value of 3. The model simulation at peak load, x = 11, produced a design quality index of 3,232.41. These findings indicate that the digital system is the most sensitive factor in maintaining terminal performance under high-load conditions, while TOD integration acts as a spatial density buffer. The study recommends implementing a radial configuration, smart wayfinding, biometric gates, self-baggage drop, smart queue systems, a compact intermodal hub, and vertical separation of passenger and baggage circulation to create an efficient, safe, comfortable, navigable, and human-centered airport terminal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arthur D. Little, & Amadeus. (2019). Airport digital transformation: From operational performance to strategic opportunity. Amadeus

Bourgeois, D. (2010). The next generation air transportation system: An answer to solve airport efficiency? Rochester Institute of Technology.

Edwards, B. (2005). The modern airport terminal: New approaches to airport architecture (2nd ed.). Spon Press.

Federal Aviation Administration. (n.d.). Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen).

Horonjeff, R., McKelvey, F. X., Sproule, W. J., & Young, S. B. (2010). Planning and design of airports (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Institute for Transportation and Development Policy. (2017). TOD standard 3.0. ITDP.

International Air Transport Association. (n.d.). One ID. IATA.

International Air Transport Association. (2025). Global passenger survey 2025. IATA.

Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. (2008). Keputusan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor KM 48 Tahun 2008 tentang Rencana Induk Bandar Udara Soekarno-Hatta.

Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor PM 36 Tahun 2021 tentang Standarisasi Fasilitas Bandar Udara.

Musholiha, N. R., & Susetyarto, M. B. (2021). Desain virtual digital gedung pameran Universitas Trisakti. Repository Universitas Trisakti

Navarro, I., Ortega-Kral, P., Patrikar, J., Wang, H., Ye, Z., Park, J. H., Oh, J., & Scherer, S. (2024). Amelia: A large model and dataset for airport surface movement forecasting. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.21185

Oliveira, A. V. M., Oliveira, B. F., & Vassallo, M. D. (2024). Airport service quality perception and flight delays: Examining the influence of psychosituational latent traits of respondents in passenger satisfaction surveys. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.02139

Oliveira, Í. R. de, Ayhan, S., Balvedi, G., Biglin, M., Costas, P., Pinto Neto, E. C., Leite, A., & de Azevedo, F. C. F. (2025). A predictive services architecture for efficient airspace operations. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.17515

Salama, A. M., & El-Attar, M. S. T. (2010). Student perceptions of the architectural design jury. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 4(2), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v4i2/3.104

Sukomardojo, T. (2021). Evaluasi pengembangan teknologi pada pelayanan penumpang di Bandara Internasional Kuala Namu. Jurnal?. https://doi.org/10.15575/jb.v1i2.21565

Tan, J. H., & Masood, T. (2021). Industry 4.0: Challenges and success factors for adopting digital technologies in airports. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.14574