THE AESTHETICS OF RESISTANCE: AN INSTALLATION BY JOMPET KUSWIDANANTO

Authors

  • Walid Syarthowi Basmalah Institut Seni Indonesia, Bali
  • I Wayan Adnyana Institut Seni Indonesia, Bali
  • I Wayan Setem Institut Seni Indonesia, Bali
  • I Wayan Karja Institut Seni Indonesia, Bali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53067/ijomral.v5i4.467

Keywords:

Jompet Kuswidananto; installation art; counter-hegemony; representation; cultural identity

Abstract

This article examines how Jompet Kuswidananto formulates a counter-hegemonic aesthetics through installation works that combine spectral figures, sonic orchestration, and material icons to challenge dominant narratives of history and Javanese-Indonesian identity in the post-New Order era. The research data consist of in-depth interviews with Jompet (2024-2025), exhibition documentation, and secondary literature. The analysis focuses on Java's Machine: Phantasmagoria (2008), which presents a parade of “ghost soldiers” and hybridises marching-band sounds with Javanese symbols, and on After Voices (2016), which articulates political memory and collective movement. The findings reveal three principal counter-hegemonic aesthetic devices: (1) spectrality, which reactivates historical trauma and destabilises the authority of representation; (2) sonic-politics, which inserts irony into militaristic and nationalist forms of discipline; and (3) symbolic iconoclasm, exemplified by the use of crystal chandeliers as allegories for the collapse of colonial power. Drawing upon Antonio Gramsci's theory of hegemony, Stuart Hall's concept of representation, and Claire Bishop's writings on installation art, this study demonstrates that Jompet’s works create a space for negotiating meaning, enriching the discourse of contemporary art in Southeast Asia. This article contributes to cultural studies by proposing the “Three S” matrix (spectrality, sonic politics, and symbolic iconoclasm) as an analytical framework for examining counter-hegemonic strategies in installation art

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agung, A. 2015. Seni rupa kontemporer Indonesia: Politik, estetika, dan identitas. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Asia Society. (2016). After Voices by Jompet Kuswidananto. Exhibition notes, Asia Society Triennial.

Bishop, C. (2005). Installation art: A critical history. London: Tate Publishing.

Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. London: Verso.

Bourriaud, N. 2002. Relational aesthetics. Dijon: Les presses du réel.

Danto, A. C. (2012). What art is. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Derrida, J. 1994. Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the new international. New York: Routledge.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Gramsci, A. (1999). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. & Trans.). London: Lawrence & Wishart. (Original work published 1971)

Gordon, A. (2008). Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination (2nd ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Hall, S. (1986). Gramsci's relevance for the study of race and ethnicity. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10(2), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/019685998601000202

Hall, S. (1996). Questions of cultural identity. London: Sage.

Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage.

Hall, S. (2013). The work of representation (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

Harsono, F. X. 2013. Testimonies: FX Harsono. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum.

Heryanto, A. (2014). Identity and Pleasure: The Politics of Indonesian Screen Culture. Singapore: NUS Press.

Holt, C. 2000. Art in Indonesia: Continuities and change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Kartodirdjo, S. (1966). The peasants’ revolt of Banten in 1888: Its conditions, course and sequel; A case study of social movements in Indonesia. ’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0796-2

Kusmara, R. 2013. Seni rupa kontemporer Indonesia: Identitas dan globalisasi. Bandung: ITB Press.

LaBelle, B. 2006. Background noise: Perspectives on sound art. New York: Continuum.

Mangunwijaya, Y. B. 1988. Seni rupa baru: Sebuah gerakan. Yogyakarta: Bentara Budaya.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Pangestu, D. 2017. Narasi hantu dalam seni instalasi Jompet Kuswidananto (Master’s thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia).

Pujiraharjo, S. (2019). Memori, identitas, dan estetika kontemporer dalam karya Jompet Kuswidananto. Jurnal Seni Rupa, 12(2), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.24821/resital.v12i2.2893

Ricoeur, P. 1976. Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press.

Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (4th ed.). London: Sage.

Supangkat, J. 2000. Indonesia modern art. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Supangkat, J. 2011. Indonesian Contemporary Art in the Global Context. Jakarta: Nadi Gallery.

Suryajaya, M. 2016. Sejarah estetika: Era klasik sampai kontemporer. Jakarta: Gang Kabel.

Suryajaya, M. 2016. “Postcolonial Aesthetics in Indonesian Contemporary Installation Art.” Journal of Aesthetics and Culture, 8(1), 1-12.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-07

How to Cite

Basmalah, W. S. ., Adnyana, I. W. ., Setem, I. W. ., & Karja, I. W. . (2026). THE AESTHETICS OF RESISTANCE: AN INSTALLATION BY JOMPET KUSWIDANANTO. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Literature, 5(4), 615–627. https://doi.org/10.53067/ijomral.v5i4.467