AVOIDANCE OR CIRCUMVENTION OF PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT (PE) STATUS

Analisis Hukum dalam Hukum Pajak Internasional

Authors

  • Marshanda Cahyani Zahra Universitas Trisakti
  • Audriana Putri Maharani Universitas Trisakti
  • Balqis Tuhfahturrahmah Universitas Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53067/ijomral.v5i2.409

Keywords:

permanent establishment, tax evasion, PE avoidance, multinational enterprises, digital economy

Abstract

This study explores the phenomenon of Permanent Establishment (PE) avoidance and evasion in Indonesia by examining how multinational companies design their business arrangements to limit tax exposure in the source country. Using an analytical approach that combines regulatory analysis, illustrative cases, and evidence from prior empirical studies, the paper uncovers several recurring practices, including the appointment of ostensibly independent agents, the deliberate separation of operational activities, the maintenance of minimal physical operations, and the increasing reliance on digital business models. In addition, the research reviews the alignment and performance of Indonesia’s domestic tax framework with OECD standards, while emphasizing ongoing difficulties linked to sophisticated corporate configurations, the rapid expansion of digital transactions, and unequal access to information between taxpayers and tax authorities. The results demonstrate that although Indonesia has formally incorporated internationally recognized rules, their effectiveness is constrained at the implementation level. Accordingly, the study highlights the necessity of reinforcing oversight mechanisms, enhancing international tax cooperation, and adopting a significant economic presence concept to more accurately address digitalized and cross-border economic activities. This research advances the academic discussion on PE-related tax avoidance and offers policy-relevant insights for legislators, tax administrators, and future researchers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arnold, B. J. (n.d.). An introduction to tax treaties. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

https://financing.desa.un.org/sites/default/files/2023-03/TT_Introduction_Eng.pdf

Avery Jones, J. F. (2006). Understanding the OECD model tax convention: The lesson of history. Florida Tax Review, 8(2), 87–128.

https://journals.upress.ufl.edu/ftr/article/view/351

Beer, S., de Mooij, R., & Liu, L. (2020). International corporate tax avoidance: A review of the channels, magnitudes, and blind spots. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(3), 660–688.

https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12305

Butarbutar, E. N. (2023). Treaty shopping sebagai bentuk penghindaran pajak internasional di Indonesia. Padjadjaran Journal of International Law, 7(2), 245–262.

https://journals.unpad.ac.id/pjih/article/view/39978

Cobham, A., & Janský, P. (2018). Global distribution of revenue loss from tax avoidance: Re-estimation and country results. Journal of International Development, 30(2), 206–232.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3348

Cockfield, A. J. (2017). Permanent establishment and the future of international taxation.

https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3124055

Darussalam, & Septiadi, D. (2017). Perjanjian penghindaran pajak berganda: Panduan, interpretasi, dan aplikasi. Danny Darussalam Tax Center.

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (n.d.). Perpajakan internasional. Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia.

https://www.pajak.go.id/perpajakan-internasional

Haryowardani, A., & Verry, F. (2023). Sengketa pajak terkait bentuk usaha tetap: Studi kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 919/B/PK/PJK/2015 (PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk). Jurnal Ilmiah Cendekia Akuntansi, 3(2), 101–115.

https://www.jurnal.ceredindonesia.or.id/index.php/injects/article/view/936

Hendri, H., Rahayu, N., & Setyowati, E. (2021). Permanent establishment issues in cross-border e-commerce transactions: Indonesian perspective. Journal of Internet and e-Business Studies, Article ID 565889.

https://ibimapublishing.com/articles/JIEBS/2021/565889/

Jordi, M. J. (2017). Substance over form dan general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) sebagai instrumen pencegah penghindaran pajak. Jurnal Hukum dan Perpajakan, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Kudła, J., Kopczewska, K., & Stachowiak-Kudła, M. (2023). Trade, investment and size inequalities between countries and the asymmetry in double taxation agreements. Economic Modelling, 122, 106244.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106244

Kuzniacki, B. (2018). The principal purpose test and legal certainty (Working paper). SSRN.

https://ssrn.com/abstract=3244765

Kuzniacki, B. (2019). The principal purpose test (PPT) in BEPS Action 6. Intertax, 47(6–7), 493–507.

https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2019047

Lang, M., & Reimer, E. (2021). The history of double taxation conventions in the pre-BEPS era. IBFD.

https://www.ibfd.org/shop/book/history-double-taxation-conventions-pre-beps-era

Nurkholis, N., & Ardiansyah, A. (2025). Penentuan bentuk usaha tetap pada kantor perwakilan perusahaan asing di Indonesia. Jurnal Pajak dan Keuangan Negara, 7(1), 45–60.

https://jurnal.pknstan.ac.id/index.php/pkn/article/view/1215

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Action plan on base erosion and profit shifting. OECD Publishing.

https://www.oecd.org/ctp/beps-action-plan-9789264202719-en.htm

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Preventing the artificial avoidance of permanent establishment status: Action 7 – 2015 final report. OECD Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264241220-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). Model tax convention on income and on capital (condensed version). OECD Publishing.

https://www.oecd.org/tax/treaties/35363840.pdf

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Prevention of tax treaty abuse: Sixth peer review report on treaty shopping. OECD Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1787/359a09f4-en

Putri, A. R., Prabowo, Y., & Sari, D. P. (2024). Penghindaran pajak internasional melalui struktur perusahaan multinasional di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 21(1), 67–84.

Setiadi, E., & Darussalam. (2019). Bentuk usaha tetap dan tantangan pemajakan ekonomi digital di Indonesia. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia, 3(2), 123–138.

United Nations. (2011). United Nations model double taxation convention between developed and developing countries. United Nations.

https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/administration/double-taxation-convention.html

Van der Bruggen, E. (n.d.). History of tax treaties and the permanent establishment concept. In Tax treaties and the permanent establishment concept. Cambridge University Press.

Apa Itu Bentuk Usaha Tetap dalam konteks Pajak Minimum Global? (2025, May 2). DDTC News.

https://news.ddtc.co.id/literasi/kamus/1810450/apa-itu-bentuk-usaha-tetap-dalam-konteks-pajak-minimum-global

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Zahra, M. C. ., Maharani, A. P. ., & Tuhfaturrahmah, B. (2026). AVOIDANCE OR CIRCUMVENTION OF PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT (PE) STATUS: Analisis Hukum dalam Hukum Pajak Internasional. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Literature, 5(2), 250–270. https://doi.org/10.53067/ijomral.v5i2.409