THE INFLUENCE OF INNOVATIVE LEARNING MODELS AND PEDAGOGICAL COMPETENCE ON TEACHER PERFORMANCE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION IN PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN SERANG REGENCY

Sinta  Deviana; Muhammad  Suparmoko; Wahyu  Wiguna

doi:10.53067/ijomral.v4i6.390

Authors

Sinta Deviana Universitas Bina Bangsa
Muhammad Suparmoko Universitas Bina Bangsa
Wahyu Wiguna Universitas Bina Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53067/ijomral.v4i6.390

Keywords:

Teacher Performance, Pedagogical Competence, Education Quality, Learning Model

Abstract

Teacher performance in learning is the performance carried out by a teacher in carrying out his duties and responsibilities in providing learning guidance in the form of knowledge and skills so that there is an increase in student learning achievement.The purpose of this study was to analyze the direct and indirect effects of innovative learning models and pedagogical competence on teacher performance and educational quality. This study was conducted in elementary schools in Serang Regency with a sample population of 189 students, drawn using random sampling. This study used path analysis and the Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) method.

The results of this study indicate that hypothesis testing shows that the innovative learning model has a positive and significant influence on teacher performance (β=0.497 t=6.417 p=0.000). The innovative learning model has a positive and significant influence on the quality of education. (β=0.205 t=2.499 p=0.012). pedagogical competence has a positive and significant influence on teacher performance (β=0.299 t=4.127 p=0.000). pedagogical competence has a positive and significant influence onquality of education (β=0.262 t=3.945 p=0.000. teacher performance has a positive and significant influence onquality of education (β=0.425 t=4.561 p=0.000). Innovative learning modelspositive influence on teacher performance throughquality of education (β=0.133 t=3.073p=0.002). pedagogical competence has a positive influence on teacher performance throughquality of education (β=0.171 t=2.958 p=0.003).So it can be concluded that there is a significant influence between innovative learning models and pedagogical competence on teacher performance with the quality of education as mediation in elementary schools in Serang Regency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd. Khalid, Hs., & Pandipa. (2019). Pengaruh kinerja guru terhadap mutu pendidikan di sekolah dasar negeri. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Dasar, 6(2), 101–112.

Alifah, N. (2021). Mutu pendidikan dan peran pendidik dalam meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Bletsoe, C., Morgan, T., & Knight, P. (2025). Quantitative methods in education research: Principles and applications. London: Routledge.

Chou, C. P. (2020). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): Concepts, methods, and applications in social science research. Singapore: Springer Nature.

Fisher, M. J., & Marshall, A. P. (2019). Understanding descriptive statistics in social science research. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Hadis, A., & Nurhayati, W. (2010). Manajemen mutu pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Ibrahim, M. (2000). Inovasi pendidikan: Konsep, strategi, dan implementasi. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Rapor Pendidikan Kabupaten Serang Tahun 2022. Pusat Data dan Teknologi Informasi (Pusdatin) Kemendikbudristek.

Khan, M. A., & Ali, S. (2015). Quality education and its impact on student learning outcomes. Islamabad: National University Press.

Maryam, S. (2020). Model pembelajaran kreatif dan dampaknya terhadap performa pendidik di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar, 5(1), 45–57.

Mualimul Huda. (2023). Pengaruh model pembelajaran inovatif terhadap kinerja guru melalui kualitas pendidikan. Jurnal Manajemen dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 9(3), 221–235.

Miarso, Y. (1987). Menempuh jalan pembaruan pendidikan. Jakarta: CV Rajawali.

Mukhtar, & Suryani, S. (2017). Manajemen pendidikan: Konsep dan praktik. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Mulyasa, E. 2012a. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan sebuah Penduan Praktis. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

_______, 2012b. Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Panigoro, D., & Yulianti Toralawe. (2025). Kapabilitas pedagogis dan kinerja pendidik dalam meningkatkan efektivitas pembelajaran. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 12(1), 33–48.

Rizky Fernanda, & Ade Irma. (2025). Pengaruh kompetensi pedagogik terhadap kualitas pendidikan di sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 13(2), 77–89.

Rohman, M. (2020). Kinerja pendidik dalam perspektif manajemen pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Roberts, L., Allen, J., & Thompson, P. (2024). Educational research design and statistical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sakhur, A., Mulyono, D., & Rahmawati, I. (2020). Kinerja guru dan profesionalisme pendidik. Malang: Literasi Nusantara.

Sanusi, U., Hidayat, T., & Fadillah, R. (2020). Kinerja guru dalam meningkatkan mutu pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Setyowati, R., Pratama, A., & Lestari, D. (2024). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif dan analisis kausalitas. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Suirat, D., & Sepriyanti, R. (2024). Model pembelajaran inovatif dan pengaruhnya terhadap kualitas pendidikan: Kajian empiris di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Inovatif, 11(1), 56–70.

Suparian, M. (2011). Kompetensi pedagogik guru profesional. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Trianto. (2011). Model-model pembelajaran inovatif berorientasi konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

Umiarso. (2011). Kepemimpinan pendidikan dan kinerja guru. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Welana, R., & Lilis Suryani. (2024). Peran kompetensi pedagogik terhadap kinerja guru melalui kualitas pendidikan. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Profesi Guru, 10(4), 185–198.