RISK ASSESSMENT AND STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS OF THE FREE NUTRITIOUS MEALS PROGRAM (MBG) FOR SCHOOL AGED CHILDREN IN INDONESIA

Authors

  • Nike Septivani Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Asuransi Trisakti
  • I Made Indra P Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Asuransi Trisakti
  • Enno Karina Fandayani Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Asuransi Trisakti
  • Wahyu Maulana Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Asuransi Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53067/ijomral.v4i4.353

Keywords:

Risk management, ISO 31000, school feeding, MBG, food safety, public policy, Indonesia

Abstract

The Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) is a nationwide initiative launched by the Indonesian government to improve children’s health and reduce malnutrition through free nutritious meals in schools. While the program is a key pillar of Indonesia’s long-term development vision (Indonesia Emas 2045), its large-scale implementation presents significant risks across operational, financial, and governance domains. This study aims to identify and assess the key risks involved in the MBG program using the ISO 31000:2018 risk management framework and a qualitative descriptive approach. Data were collected through field observations, structured interviews, stakeholder questionnaires, and document analysis involving schools, catering service providers, and student beneficiaries. Risk levels were assessed based on probability and impact ratings, and further analyzed using a risk matrix and SWOT framework. Findings reveal that schools face the highest risk exposure, particularly in areas of delayed budget disbursement, food safety, and governance transparency. Catering providers reported medium risks related to delivery logistics and hygiene standards, while students expressed concerns primarily related to meal variety and portion sizes. Three priority risk categories were identified: financial uncertainty, food quality assurance, and program accountability. This study contributes to the growing literature on public nutrition policy and risk governance by providing evidence-based recommendations to enhance program implementation. Key recommendations include digital risk monitoring platforms, improved stakeholder coordination, food safety audits, and policy transparency mechanisms. By managing these risks proactively, the MBG program can be transformed into a sustainable and equitable intervention to improve child health and education outcomes in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, J. (2018). Evaluation of Mid-Day Meal Scheme in India: Issues and Policy Recommendations. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40(4), 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2018.02.002

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

FAO. (2019). School Food and Nutrition Framework: Brazil Country Case. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/documents

Fandayani, L., Ramadhani, S., & Syam, M. (2025). Risk Assessment of Government-Driven Nutrition Programs: An Indonesian Case. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik dan Pembangunan, 12(1), 33–44.

Gelli, A., Espejo, F., & Drake, L. (2019). A comparison of school feeding delivery mechanisms: Costs and cost-effectiveness of school feeding programs in low- and middle-income countries. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 40(4), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0379572119864391

International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management – Guidelines. Geneva: ISO.

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2022. Jakarta: Pusat Data dan Informasi Kemenkes RI.

Okolo-Obasi, E. N. (2020). Risk and Implementation Analysis of Nigeria’s School Feeding Programme. Journal of African Development, 22(3), 55–70.

SSGI. (2022). Survei Status Gizi Indonesia Tahun 2022. Jakarta: Badan Kebijakan Pembangunan Kesehatan, Kementerian Kesehatan RI.

UNICEF. (2020). Policy Brief: Nutrition and Social Protection in Brazil. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/brazil

World Bank. (2021). Investing in Early Years: The Economic Case for Nutrition in Indonesia. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org

World Food Programme (WFP). (2022). State of School Feeding Worldwide 2022. Rome: WFP. https://www.wfp.org/publications/state-school-feeding-worldwide-2022

Downloads

Published

2025-07-07

How to Cite

Septivani, N. ., Indra P, I. M. ., Fandayani, E. K. ., & Maulana, W. . (2025). RISK ASSESSMENT AND STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS OF THE FREE NUTRITIOUS MEALS PROGRAM (MBG) FOR SCHOOL AGED CHILDREN IN INDONESIA. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Literature, 4(4), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.53067/ijomral.v4i4.353