DESCRIPTION OF STUDENTS' DESIGN THINKING ABILITY BASED ON LEVEL OF CREATIVITY

Authors

  • Gunawan Gunawan Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Fellya Mailanufi Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Jaka Wijaya Kusuma Universitas Bina Bangsa
  • Chumaedi Sugihandardji Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Erni Widiyastuti Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53067/ijomral.v2i6.167

Keywords:

Level of Creativity, Design Thinking Ability, Creativity

Abstract

Design thinking can help students think outside the box and develop creativity. This study aims to describe students' design thinking skills based on the level of creativity in class X Merdeka 8 SMA Negeri 1 Purwokerto. The subjects involved in this study were 36 students. The type of research used is qualitative descriptive. The data collection techniques used are written tests, interviews, and documentation. Based on the results of the creativity level test, students are grouped into five levels, namely very creative, creative, quite creative, less creative and not creative. Each level of creativity is chosen by one student using purposive sampling techniques. The results of this study show that students with a very creative and creative level are able to meet the five indicators of design thinking, namely emphatize, define, ideate, prototype, and test. Students with a creative level are able to meet 4 indicators, namely emphatize, define, ideate and prototype. While students with non-creative levels are only able to meet the indicators of emphatize, define, and ideate

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adiansha, A. A., Khatimah, H., & Asriyadin. (2020). Pengembangan Kreativitas Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Melalui Model Brain Based Learning Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 10(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v10i1.327

Albay, E. M., & Eisma, D. v. (2021). Performance task assessment supported by the design thinking process: Results from a true experimental research. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100116

Amrullah, S., Tae, L. F., Irawan, F. I., Ramdani, Z., & Prakoso, B. H. (2018). Studi Sistematik Aspek Kreativitas dalam Konteks Pendidikan. Psympathic : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 5(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v5i2.3533

Appulembang, Y. A. (2017). Norma Kreativitas Menggunakan Torrance Test of Creativity Thinking Untuk Anak Usia 6-12 Tahun. Provitae Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, 9(1), 41–57.

Brown, T. (2008). Design Thinking, Harvard Business Review, 6, 84-92.

Cahdriyana, R. A., & Setyorini, R. (2019). Tingkat Kreativitas Slow Learners dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol4no1.2019pp1-14

Cross, N. (2007). Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer.

Gunawan, G., Fitrianingsih, R., Akhsani, L., Setyaningsih, E., & Kusuma, J. W. (2022). DEVELOPMENT MODULE BASED ON REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION ON STUDENT'S MATHEMATIC CONNECTION SKILLS. International Journal of Economy, Education and Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 317-324.

Henriksen, D., Gretter, S., & Richardson, C. (2018). Design thinking and the practicing teacher: addressing problems of practice in teacher education. Teaching Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1531841

Khumaidi, M. S., & Budiarto, M. T. (2013a). Jenjang Kreativitas Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Matematika Siswa. MATHedunesa, 2(3).

Maharani, R. H., & Sukestiyarno. (2017). Learning Analysis based on Humanism Theory and Mathematics Creative Thinking Ability of Students. International Conference on Mathematics: Education, Theory, and Application (ICMETA), 1, 218–225.

Mauliya, A., & Wulandari, S. (2021). Empathy dan Design Thinking dalam Inovasi Manajemen Pendidikan Islam di Era Disruptif. Jurnal Paedagogia, 10(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.24239/pdg.Vol10.Iss1.139

Monawati, & Fauzi. (2018). Hubungan Kreativitas Mengajar Guru dengan Prestasi. Universitas Syiah Kuala, 6(2), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.24815/pear.v6i2.12195

Murdiana, Jumri, R., & Damara, B. E. P. (2020). Pengembangan Kreativitas Guru dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 05(02), 153–160.

Purwanto, J., Setyautami, C., Gunawan, G., Ulia, N., & Kusuma, J. W. (2022). DESCRIPTION OF STUDENT'S MATHEMATIC COMMUNICATION ABILITY REVIEWING FROM PERCEPTION OF MATHEMATICS. International Journal of Economy, Education and Entrepreneurship, 2(3), 806-813.

Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429

Rusdin, & Ali, M. (2020). Macro Approach in National Education System. Jurnal Paedagogia, 9(2), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.24239/pdg.Vol9.Iss2.65

Sari, I. P., Kartina, A. H., Pratiwi, A. M., Oktariana, F., Nasrulloh, M. F., & Zain, S. A. (2020). Implementasi Metode Pendekatan Design Thinking dalam Pembuatan Aplikasi Happy Class Di Kampus UPI Cibiru. Jurnal Pendidikan Multimedia, 2(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.17509/edsence.v2i1.25131

Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering Creativity through Instruction Rich in Mathematical Problem Solving and Problem Posing.

Setianti, S., Hanafiani, L. G., Devianti, V., Wahyuni, S., Kusuma, J. W., & Khan, F. (2022). MOTIF TIRTAYASA, KEPANDEAN AND KAWANGSAN ON BANTEN BATIK IN MATHEMATICAL THEORY. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Literature, 1(3), 353-358.

Siswono, T. Y. E. (2004). Identifying Creative Thinking Process Of Students Through Mathematics Problem Posing. International Conference on Statistics and Mathematics and Its Application in the Development of Science and Technology, 85–89. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.1.1.794.17-40

Siswono, T. Y. E. (2010). Leveling Students’ Creative Thinking in Solving and Posing Mathematical Problem. IndoMS. J.M.E, 1(1), 17–40.

Tsalapatas, H., Heidmann, O., Pata, K., De Carvalho, C. V., Bauters, M., Papadopoulos, S., Katsimendes, C., Taka, C., & Houstis, E. (2019). Teaching Design Thinking through Gamified Learning. In CSEDU 2019—Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (pp. 278-283). Science and Technology Publications.

Wigati, M., Gunawan, G., Akhsani, L., & Kusuma, J. W. (2023). DESCRIPTION OF UNDERSTANDING MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTS ABILITY BASED ON BRAIN DOMINATION. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Literature, 2(2), 242-249.

Wijaya, A. (2012). Pendidikan Matematika Realistik, Suatu Alternatif Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika. Graha Ilmu.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-06

How to Cite

Gunawan, G., Mailanufi, F. ., Kusuma, J. W. ., Sugihandardji, C. ., & Widiyastuti, E. . (2023). DESCRIPTION OF STUDENTS’ DESIGN THINKING ABILITY BASED ON LEVEL OF CREATIVITY. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Literature, 2(6), 786–795. https://doi.org/10.53067/ijomral.v2i6.167