EXAMINING THE REGULATIONS GOVERNING OFFSHORE DECOMMISSIONING IN FIVE COUNTRIES ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53067/ijomral.v4i1.290Keywords:
Decommissioning regulations, Offshore, Abandonment, RemovalAbstract
In the decades ahead, the decommissioning of offshore structures worldwide will remain a persistent issue, as numerous structures will surpass their expiration or become unproductive when reservoirs are no longer utilized. This article analyzes the global offshore decommissioning legal framework and summarizes the rules in countries recognized for their expertise in decommissioning, specifically the UK, Norway, and the USA. The oil-producing nations of Malaysia and Thailand in Southeast Asia are examined to uncover potential deficiencies in decommissioning legislation for countries at the nascent decommissioning stage. The distinctions were recognized regarding decommissioning preparation, technical execution of decommissioning, supplementary environmental standards, and the financial security framework. In conclusion, most legislation about the technical sector is analogous throughout all examined countries. Significant distinctions exist between two primary philosophies of the framework: a prescriptive regime and a goal-setting regime. Other decommissioning facets garner heightened scrutiny, including the elucidation of in situ decommissioning, residual liabilities, the optimization of financial considerations associated with decommissioning, and the transfer of waste from offshore to onshore. The deficiencies in the current framework can be addressed by adopting an evidence-based approach in its development
Downloads
References
ASEAN Council on Petroleum (ASCOPE), 2012. International decommissioning laws, regulations, and guidelines referenced in decommissioning. In: The ASEAN Council on Petroleum (Ed.), ASCOPE Decommissioning Guidelines (ADG) for Oil and Gas Facilities. The ASEAN Council on Petroleum, pp. 2031.
Bell, N., Smith, J., (1999). Coral growing on North Sea oil rigs. Nature 482, 601. https://doi.org/10.1038/45127.
Bindemann, K., (1999). Production-sharing Agreements: An Economic Analysis. Oxford Inst. Energy Stud. WPM 25.
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (USA), 2016a. Decommissioning FAQ [WWW document]. http://www.bsee.gov/BSEE-Newsroom/Publications-Library/FAQ/Decommissioning/. (Accessed 7 August 2016).
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (USA), 2016b. Rigs to reefs [WWW document]. http://www.bsee.gov/About-BSEE/Divisions/ecd/ECD-Rigs-to-Reefs/.(Accessed 7 November 2016).
Celata, M., (2016). Regulatory considerations for ensuring. Decommissioning other lease obligations [WWW document]. http://www.boem.gov/2016-02-04-PLANO-RiskPresentation-Celata/.(Accessed 20 June 2016).
Chaiyasit, N., Kositanont, C., Yeh, S., Gallup, D., Young, L., 2010. Decontamination of mercury-contaminated steel (API 5L-X52) using iodine and iodide Lixiviant. Mod. Appl. Sci. 4, 1220.
Chandler, J., White, D., Techera, E.J., Gourvenec, S., Draper, S., (2017). Engineering and legal considerations for decommissioning offshore oil and gas infrastructure in Australia. Ocean. Eng. 131, 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.12.030.
Decomm North Sea, (2017). About us [WWW document]. http://decomnorthsea.com/about-dns/about-us. (Accessed 6 July 2017).
Department for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy UK, 2011. Decommissioning of Offshore Oil and Gas Installations and Pipelines under the Petroleum Act 1998.Offshore Decommissioning, Aberdeen.
Fairfield Fagus Limited, (2017). Osprey field subsea infrastructure comparative assessment [WWW document]. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/668411/Osprey_Final_DP.pdf. (Accessed 3 January 2017).
Fam, M.L., Tan, H.K., Konovessis, D., Ong, L.S., 2017. A review of offshore decommissioning Regulations in three countries - strengths and weaknesses. In: ASME 2017 36th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, pp. 1–14.
Fowler, A.M., Macreadie, P.I., Jones, D.O.B., Booth, D.J., (2014). A multi-criteria decision approach to decommissioning of offshore oil and gas infrastructure. Ocean Coast.Manag 87, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.10.019.
Gao, Z., (1997). Current international law issues on offshore abandonment, with special reference to the United Kingdom. Ocean. Dev. Int. Law 28, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908329709546095
Government of USA, 2014a. Title 40: - Protection of Environment, Part 435- Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category, Sub-part a - Offshore Subcategory—the USA.
Government of USA, 2014b. Title 30: Mineral Resources, Part 250- Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations in the Outer Continental Shelf, Sub-part Q – Decommissioning Activities. The USA.
Hamzah, B.A., (2003). International rules on decommissioning of offshore installations: some observations. Mar. Policy 27, 339348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308597X(03)00040-X.
International Maritime Organisation, 2006. Convention on preventing marine pollution by dumping wastes and other matter [WWW document]. http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/LCLP/Pages/default.aspx. (Accessed 30 November 2016).
International Maritime Organisation, 1989. Resolution A.672 (16) Guidelines and Standards for the Removal of Offshore Installations and Structures on the Continental Shelf and in the Exclusive Economic Zone.
Jørgensen, D., (2012). OSPAR's exclusion of rigs-to-reefs in the North Sea. Ocean Coast. Manag 58, 5761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.12.012.
Kaiser, M.J., Pulsipher, A.G., (2005). Rigs-to-Reef programs in the Gulf of Mexico. Ocean.Dev. Int. Law 36, 119134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320590943990.
Lyons, Y., (2012). Offshore decommissioning in Southeast Asia and the opportunity [WWW document]. http://cil.nus.edu.sg/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/YounaLyonsHalifax_DecomSEA.pdf.(Accessed 23 June 2016).
Macreadie, P.I., Fowler, A.M., Booth, D.J., (2011). Rigs-to-reefs: will the deep sea benefit from artificial habitat? Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1890/100112.
Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (Norway), 2010. FACTS - the Norwegian petroleum sector 2010 [WWW document]. http://www.npd.no/en/Publications/Facts/Facts2010/.
Norwegian Climate and Pollution Agency, 2011. Decommissioning of offshore installations [WWW Document]. http://www.npd.no/en/Publications/Reports/Decommissioning-of-offshore-installations/.
Oil, Gas, U.K., 2015. Guidelines for Comparative Assessment in Decommissioning Programmes.
Osmudsen, P., Tveteras, R., 2003. Decommissioning of petroleum installations – major policy issues. Energy Policy 31, 1579–1588 doi: Pii S0301-4215(02)00224-0.
OSPAR Commission, 2013. 2013 Update of the Inventory of Oil and Gas Offshore Installations in the OSPAR Maritime Area. Offshore Industry Series.
OSPAR Commission, 2009. Assessment of construction or placement of artificial reefs [WWW Document]. http://qsr2010.ospar.org/media/assessments/p00438_Artificial_reefs_assessment.pdf.
OSPAR Commission, 2007. Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic, pp. 1–33.
OSPAR Commission, 1998. OSPAR decision 98/3 on the disposal of disused offshore installations [WWW document]. https://www.ospar.org/convention/agreements? q¼Osparþdecisionþ98%2F3&t¼&a¼&s¼.
Petroleum Institute of Thailand, 2008. Draft Thailand Decommissioning Guidelines for Upstream Installations [Www Document]. URL Draft Thail. Decommissioning Guidel. Upstream Installations - Final.
Petroleum Safety Authority (Norway), 2015a. Regulation guidelines for petroleum activities [WWW document]. http://www.psa.no/activities/category404.html#_Toc442268047. (Accessed 7 May 2016).
Petroleum Safety Authority (Norway), 2015b. Handbook for Application for Acknowledgement of Compliance (AoC).
PETRONAS, (2017). Decommissioning safety: Dana and D30 decommissioning project. In: SPE Workshop: Process Safety and Technical Risk Assessment.
PETRONAS, (2008). PETRONAS Procedures and Guidelines for Upstream Activities Revision 2.
Pradnyana, G., (2017). Offshore Platform Decommissioning in Indonesia: Some Issues and Concerns, in: 4th IndoDecomm.
Schroeder, D.M., Love, M.S., 2004. Ecological and political issues surrounding the decommissioning offshore oil facilities in the Southern California Bight. Ocean Coast. Manag 47, 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2004.03.002.
Standards Norway (NORSOK), 2013. D-010: Well Integrity in Drilling and Well Operations Rev 4.
Stortinget (Norwegian Government), 2000. Recommendation of the Energy and Environment Committee on the Disposal of Disused Pipelines and Cables on the Norwegian Continental Shelf. Report No. No. 47 (1999–2000) Disponering Av
Utrangerte Rørledninger Og Kabler På Norsk Kontinentalsokkel. St.Meld. [WWWDocument]. https://www.stortinget.no/no/Saker-og-publikasjoner/Saker/Sak/?p¼20500.
Soomro, Hira, Nooraini Zainuddin, Hanita Daud, Joshua Sunday, Noraini Jamaludin, Abdullah Abdullah, Apriyanto Mulono, and Evizal Abdul Kadir. "3-Point block backward differentiation formula with an off-step point for the solutions of stiff chemical reaction problems." Journal of Mathematical Chemistry 61, no. 1 (2023): 75-97.
Yulianti, Y., Apriyanto, M., Azhar, A., & Fikri, K. N. S. (2023). Implementasi Program Aksi Ketahanan Pangan Di Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir. Selodang Mayang: Jurnal Ilmiah Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir, 9(1), 16-24.
Apriyanto, M., Azhar, A., Fikri, K. N. S., & Puspitasari, F. (2022). The Legality Of Cultivated Palm Oil, Research On The Readiness Of Small Holder Farmers In Indonesia To Produce Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) Is Reviewed. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 3(2), 76-81.
Apriyanto, M., Marlina, M., Mardesci, H., & Riono, Y. Forest and Environmental Fires in Sustainable Palm Oil for Independent Smallholders. International Journal of Environmental & Agriculture Research (IJOEAR).
Azhar, A., Fikri, K. N. S., & Apriyanto, M. (2023). Pelestarian Makam Syekh Abdurrahman Siddiq Melalui Pengenalan Hukum Tatanegara Dalam Festival Kampung. Journal of Community Dedication, 3(1), 78-87.
Apriyanto, M., Fitriani, D., Priyanto, T., & Razak, A. (2024). Post-Harvest Agricultural Innovation of Indonesian Horticulture in Suriname. Symbiosis Civicus, 1(2), 51-56.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eno Saputra, Ari Anggara, Husaini Husaini, Ricco Salasa, Donni Haryadi, M. Rafik, KMS Novyar Satriawan Fikri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.